Movie Review: Michael (2026)

Nazish Akhtar

2 hours ago

Michael (2026) works best as a visually rich, emotionally accessible homage to an extraordinary artist. While it may disappoint viewers seeking a deep, unflinching examination of Michael Jackson’s lif
images.jpg

Michael (2026), directed by Antoine Fuqua, is an ambitious biographical drama that chronicles the early life and meteoric rise of Michael Jackson, from his childhood in Gary, Indiana, to his dominance as the King of Pop by the late 1980s. Starring Jaafar Jackson—Michael Jackson’s real‑life nephew—in his acting debut, the film focuses heavily on performance, spectacle, and musical legacy rather than controversy.

One of the film’s greatest strengths is its casting. Jaafar Jackson delivers an uncanny portrayal, capturing his uncle’s voice, dance style, and stage presence with striking authenticity. The transition from child Michael (played impressively by Juliano Krue Valdi) to adult superstardom feels emotionally grounded, especially in scenes highlighting Michael’s strained relationship with his father, Joseph Jackson, portrayed powerfully by Colman Domingo.

Visually and musically, Michael is polished and immersive. The recreation of iconic performances and concert moments is electrifying, particularly in IMAX presentations, where sound design and choreography shine. Critics widely agree that the film succeeds as a theatrical experience and musical celebration.

However, the film has drawn criticism for its selective storytelling. As an estate‑approved biopic, Michael deliberately avoids the more controversial and troubling chapters of Jackson’s life, ending before the allegations and personal decline of the 1990s. Many reviewers describe it as a “sanitized” or “play‑it‑safe” portrayal that prioritizes legacy over complexity, leaving the narrative feeling incomplete despite strong performances.

Commercially, the film has been a major success, opening to strong box‑office numbers worldwide and proving that Michael Jackson’s cultural influence remains immense. Audiences have responded more positively than critics, embracing the film as a tribute rather than a definitive biography.